ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
A. V. Ovcharov
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 71 | Number 3 | April 2017 | Pages 333-338
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2016.1273693
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Separation factors for ideal gas phase isotopic exchange reactions between water vapor and hydrogen were calculated for deuterium-protium exchange in the presence of trace amounts of tritium using adiabatic correction factors calculated by Bardo and Wolfsberg. The results obtained support the conclusions made by Bardo and later by Rolston that the application of adiabatic correction factors leads to slightly lower and more precise values of equilibrium constants or separation factors in comparison to separation factors straightforwardly calculated from the isotopic partition function ratios published by Bron, Chang and Wolfsberg. The difference for protium-trace tritium exchange is relatively low, at 333 K it amounts to 2.2%. Comparison with published experimental data on tritium exchange in the low deuterium concentration limit shows that the corrected values better reproduce experiment at least at temperatures below 383 K confirming earlier conclusions made for protium-deuterium exchange. Results are given in the form of 2D polynomial fits over wide range of deuterium concentration and temperature that is useful for the application of them in equation-oriented process modeling systems for the modeling of CECE process.