ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
M. Murakamia, V. Arunasalam, J.D. Bella, M.G. Bell, M. Bitter, W.R. Blanchard, F. Boody, D. Boydb, N. Bretz, C.E. Busha, J.D. Callenc, J.L. Cecchi, R.J. Colchina, J. Coonrod, S.L. Davis, D. Dimock, H.F. Dylla, P.C. Efthimion, L.C. Emersona, A.C. Englanda, H.P. Eubank, R. Fonck, E. Fredrickson, H.P. Furth, L.R. Grisham, S. von Goeler, R.J. Goldston, B. Grek, D.J. Grove, R.J. Hawryluk, H. Hendeld, K.W. Hill, R. Hulse, D. Johnson, L.C. Johnson, R. Kaita, J. Kamperschroer, S.M. Kaye, M. Kikuchie, S. Kilpatrick, H. Kugel, P.H. LaMarche, R. Little, C.H. Maa, D. Manos, D. Mansfield, M. McCarthy, R.T. McCann, D.C. McCune, K. McGuire, D.M. Meade, S.S. Medley, D.R. Mikkelsen, D. Mueller, E. Nieschmidtf, D.K. Owens, V.K. Parea, H. Park, B. Prichard, A. Ramsey, D.A. Rasmussena, A.L. Roquemore, P.H. Rutherford, N.R. Sauthoff, J. Schivell, J-L. Schwobg, S.D. Scott, S. Sesnic, M. Shimadae, J.E. Simpkinsa, J. Sinnis, F. Staufferb, B. Stratton, S. Suckewer, G.D. Tait, G. Taylor, F. Tenney, C.E. Thomasa, H.H. Towner, M. Ulrickson, R. Wieland, M. Williams, K-L. Wong, A. Wouters, H. Yamadah, S. Yoshikawa, K.M. Young, M.C Zarnstorff
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 657-663
Plasma Engineering | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A40115
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The paper describes the present (end of February 1985) status of the plasma confinement studies in the TFTR tokamak with emphasis on those with neutral beam injection (NBI). Recent improvements in the device capabilities have substantially extended operating parameters: BT increased to 4.0 T, Ip to 2.0 MA, injection power (Pb) to 5 MW with H° or D° beams, to 5 × 1019 m−3 and Zeff reduced to 1.4. With ohmic heating (OH) alone, the previously established scaling for gross energy confinement time (τE ∝ ) has been confirmed at higher Ip and BT, and the maximum τE of 0.4 sec has been achieved. With NBI at Pb, substantially (by factor > 2) higher than POH, excellent power and particle accountability have been established. This suggests that the less-than-expected increase in stored energy with NBI is not due to problems of power delivery, but due to problems of confinement deterioration. τE is observed to scale approximately as Ip Pb−0.5 (independent of ), consistent with previous L-mode scalings. With NBI we have achieved the maximum τE of 0.2 s and the maximum Ti (o) of 4.4 keV in the normal operating regime, and even higher Ti(o) in the energetic-ion regime with low-ne and low Ip operation.
