ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
M.Z. Youssef, Y. Watanabe, M. Abdou, M. Nakagawa, T. Mori, K. Kosako, T. Nakamura
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 15 | Number 2 | March 1989 | Pages 1299-1308
Blanket Nucleonics Experiment | doi.org/10.13182/FST89-A39869
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several fusion-oriented integral experiments were performed in Phase II of the U.S./JAERI Collaborative Program on Fusion Neutronics where the geometrical configurations and source condition closely simulate the incident spectrum in fusion reactors. The main objective of the program is to estimate the uncertainties involved in predicting tritium breeding rate in Li2O and other neutronics parameters in fusion blankets that include engineering features (i.e., first wall, multiplier). In Phase II, the Li2O test assembly is placed on one end of a Li2CO3 enclosure that houses the D-T neutron source. Predicted local and integrated tritium production rates (TPR) from 6Li(T6), 7Li(T7) and natural lithium (TN) were compared to measurements in various configurations that included reference, first wall and beryllium multiplier experiments (Phase IIA) in addition to repeating these experiments with a FW/Be layer covering the interior surface of the Li2CO3 enclosure (Phase IIB). Other neutronics parameters that included source characterization by foil measurements, in-system reaction rates, and in-system spectrum measurements were also analyzed. The analyses were carried out independently by both parties using various 3-D Monte Carlo codes and 2-D discrete ordinates codes and data libraries. The results of the analyses are reported in this paper with emphasis placed on the impact of the beryllium data on the discrepancies found between predictions and measurements.