ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
F. Granberg, D. Terentyev, K. O. E. Henriksson, F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 66 | Number 1 | July-August 2014 | Pages 283-288
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST13-728
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Iron carbide (Fe3C), also known as cementite, is present in many steels and has also been seen as nanosized precipitates in steels. We examine the interaction of edge dislocations with nanosized cementite precipitates in Fe by molecular dynamics. The simulations are carried out with a Tersoff-like bond order interatomic potential by Henriksson et al. for Fe-C-Cr systems. Comparing the results obtained with this potential for a defect free Fe system with results from previously used potentials, we find that the potential by Henriksson et al. gives significantly higher values for the critical stress, at least at low temperatures. The explanation was found to be the difference in the core structure of the edge dislocation. The results show that edge dislocations can unpin from cementite precipitates of sizes 1 nm and 2 nm even at a temperature of 1 K, although the stresses needed for this are high. On the other hand, a 4 nm precipitate is not sheared by edge dislocations at low temperatures (≤100 K) on our simulation timescale.