ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
D. B. Montgomery
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1893-1897
Magnetic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29995
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ITER Magnetics R&D plan developed during the Conceptual Design Activity identified the need to build both central solenoid (CS) and toroidal field (TF) model coils. In the CDA plan both model sets were circular. The CS model coil would have an inner diameter of 2 m, a field of 13 T and no case, whereas the TF model coils would have a 4 m diameter, a field of 11 T field, and a surrounding case. The U.S. has proposed instead that the TF model coil be down sized and made noncircular, so that a 2 m x 3.5 m model can be combined with the CS model coils, still allowing full simulation of the ITER TF stresses. This smaller assembly of coils, which would use full-scale conductors, would be less expensive to build, and would be more suitable for conducting an extensive set of cyclic extended performance tests. To compensate for the loss of large coil fabrication with the down-sizing of the TF model coil, the U.S. has propose that a full-scale ITER TF magnet double pancake, or two layers of a nested shell concept, be fabricated from production conductor, and that the coil element and its structure be cold tested in a prototypical “Q/A Production Test.”