ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Winfried Kernbichler
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 4 | July 1992 | Pages 2297-2306
Technical Paper | Special Issue on D-He Fusion / D-3He/Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The intrinsic potential of a field-reversed configuration (FRC) for high-beta operation (beta values in the range of 50 to 100%) stimulates much interest in this device as an attractive candidate for a compact fusion reactor with high power density. Several additional benefits, e.g., the cylindrical geometry of the concept, the simplicity of the magnetic system, the simply connected plasma, the low synchrotron radiation, the divertor action of the open field lines, and the possibility for direct energy conversion of the charged-particle flow, justify a closer look at the benefits and problems of FRCs. The emphasis here is on operation with D-3He fuel under reactor-relevant conditions, whereas deuterium-tritium (D-T) is taken as a reference case. The reasons for that choice are that (a) D-3He offers intrinsic advantages over D-T in neutron production and radioactive inventory and (b) the high-beta regime of an FRC matches ideally some of the requirements for D-3He operation. A steady-state version of an FRC is considered to be more attractive than its pulsed counterpart. Frequent startup to high temperatures would be particularly detrimental for D-3He, where startup scenarios seem to rely either on the transition from D-T to D-3He, with unavoidable strong tritium contamination, or on high-power neutral beam injection.