ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
C. R. Walthers, E. M. Jenkins, D. W. Sedgley, T. H. Batzer, S. Konishi, S. O'Hira, Y. Naruse
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1811-1813
Impurity Control and Plasma-Facing Component | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29606
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In 1988, a prototypical vacuum system was added to the Tritium Systems Test Assembly (TSTA) at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Since then various pumping scenarios, which might be expected in a fusion reactor, have been performed without any serious shortcomings being apparent in the use of compound cryopumps as reactor high vacuum pumps. Last year, the question of whether a compound pump was necessary was addressed in a pair of runs in which deuterium helium mixtures were pumped on a single 4K activated charcoal panel. In these tests, the condensing stage of the pump was maintained at 77K and did not contribute to pumping either deuterium or helium. Results were very encouraging: in both tests the charcoal readily pumped helium until a max loading of 0.4 T 1 cm−2 of helium on charcoal was attained. Helium speed was not affected by deuterium which may have been pumped by either a condensing or sorbing mechanism or by a combination of both. In addition, the helium loading at saturation was 0.4 T 1 cm−2 even though the D2/He ratio was doubled between runs. Conjecture about why the charcoal helium capacity was constant led to the pump operation described in this paper. It was felt that measurement of helium capacity after careful deuterium preloads might help to explain the mechanism involved in co-pumping of a condensible and a noncondensible on a single 4K cryosorber surface. This paper presents the results of series of helium capacity runs preceded by a range of deuterium preloads and attempts to explain the mechanism involved.