ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Keiji Miyazaki, Kensuke Konishi, Hiroshi Aoyama, Shoji Inoue, Nobuo Yamaoka
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 961-968
Blanket Technology | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29467
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For reducing the liquid metal MHD pressure drop in the inlet and outlet pipings of a fusion power reactor, the authors proposed a circular duct of electrically insulating function which consists of an outer pipe of metal structure and an inner pipe of insulating ceramics. A basic experiment was made with NaK. The test section which was made of a 25.4 mm O.D. 2.1 mm thick 304-SS pipe and a concentrically inserted 20 mm O.D., 1.0 mm thick FRP pipe with 0.6 mm clearance filled with NaK. The results are quite encouraging as summarized below. (1) The MHD drop gradient is proportional to the flow velocity U and the magnetic flux density B (c.f. B2 for a conducting duct). (2) It is 1.6 times larger than the Shercliff's theory for perfect insulation. (3) It is reduced down to 4.6% at B= 1.0 T and to 3.2% at B= 1.5 T in comparison with the case of uninsulated duct, and to less than 1% if merely extended to B= 5 T or higher.