ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
DOE-NE’s newest fuel consortium includes defense from antitrust laws
The Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy is setting up a nuclear fuel Defense Production Act Consortium that will seek voluntary agreements with interested companies “to increase fuel availability, provide more access to reliable power, and end America’s reliance on foreign sources of enriched uranium and critical materials needed to power the nation’s nuclear renaissance.” According to an August 22 DOE press release, the plan invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) to give consortium members “defense from antitrust laws when certain criteria are met” and “allow industry consultation to develop plans of action.” DOE-NE is looking for interested companies to join the consortium ahead of its first meeting, scheduled for October 14.
R. Stephen Devoto, William L. Barr, Richard H. Bulmer, Robert B. Campbell, Max E. Fenstermacher, Joseph D. Lee, B. Grant Logan, John R. Miller, Louis L. Reginato, R. A. Krakowski, Ronald L. Miller, Oscar A. Anderson, W. S. Cooper, Joel H. Schultz, James J. Yugo, Joel H. Fink, Yousry Gohar
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 2 | March 1991 | Pages 251-272
Technical Paper | Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29363
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The extensions of the physics and engineering guidelines for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) device needed for acceptable operating points for a steady-state tokamak power reactor are examined. Noninductive current drive is provided in steady state by high-energy neutral beam injection in the plasma core, lower hybrid slow waves in the outer regions of the plasma, and bootstrap current. Three different levels of extension of the ITER physics/engineering guidelines, with differing assumptions on the possible plasma beta, elongation, and aspect ratio, are considered for power reactor applications. Plasma gain Q = fusion power/input power in excess of 20 and average neutron wall fluxes from 2.3 to 3.6 MW/m2 are predicted in devices with major radii varying from 7.0 to 6.0 m and aspect ratios from 2.9 to 4.3. Only modest enhancements over L-mode (Goldston) energy confinement are required. Peak divertor heat fluxes range up to 12.4 MW/m2, which is somewhat higher than the current ITER design limit of 10 MW/m2 with a magnetically swept divertor. These designs were selected on the basis of improvements in physics/engineering consistent with time scales for development of future reactors. The design reoptimization on the basis of cost of electricity (COE) was then examined using a reactor systems model. This analysis generally verified the original estimates for the required extensions of the ITER guidelines. The COE is projected to be <66 mill/kW(electric) · h in all of the configurations. The smallest reactor, which has the largest neutron wall flux and mass power density, yields the lowest COE, 56 mill/kW(electric)· h. While these costs are marginally competitive with fission power, these modest extensions of the ITER guidelines do produce a viable power reactor. With time for further improvements such as those pursued in the ARIES study, similar designs could present an even more competitive commercial product.