ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Kiyoshi Yoshikawa, Yasushi Yamamoto, Hisayuki Toku, Akira Kobayashi, Toru Okazaki
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 15 | Number 4 | July 1989 | Pages 1541-1559
Technical Paper | Energy Storage, Switching, and Conversion | doi.org/10.13182/FST89-A25343
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A 5-yr study of beam direct energy conversion was performed at the Kyoto University Institute of Atomic Energy to clarify the essential features of direct energy recovery from monoenergetic ion beams so that the performance characteristics of energy recovery can be predicted reasonably well by numerical calculations. The study used an improved version of an electrostatically electron-suppressed beam direct converter originally proposed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Secondary electron suppressor grids were added, and a helium ion beam was used with typical parameters of 15.4 keV, 90 mA, and 100 ms. By adopting negatively biased secondary electron suppressor grids, the energy recovery efficiency increased from 72 ± 4 to 87 ± 6% even at relatively high pressures of 10−2 Pa, based on three independent measurements of the incident ion current, including a newly developed “in situ” measurement by a Rogowski coil sensor. The operational region could also be extended to more high-pressure regions. A comparison of experimental results with numerical results by the two-dimensional Kyoto University Advanced DART (KUAD) code, including evaluation of atomic processes, shows excellent agreement. Adoption of the mesh-type electron suppressor instead of the solid suppressor results in further improvements in the beam direct energy recovery.