ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Arthur W. Dalton
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 409-415
Technical Paper | Tritium System | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25072
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A cylinder of natural lithium carbonate, supported on a slab of graphite, was irradiated from above by a low-intensity source of 14-MeV neutrons and the tritium produced within it subsequently determined from measurements of beta activity. Results obtained for small lithium carbonate detectors highly enriched in 6Li (96%) or 7Li (99.9%) at six positions along the cylinder axis were compared with predictions based on three-dimensional Monte Carlo calculations and multi-group cross-section data. The experimental accuracy was sufficient to detect deviations from theory > 7% with a 95% level of confidence. On this basis, good agreement with theoretical predictions was obtained for the 7Li results. For the 6Li data, however, significant differences were observed in the lower half of the assembly. A detailed analysis indicated that these deviations could not be explained in terms of conceivable environmental perturbations of the neutron flux and may arise as a consequence of inadequate representation of anisotropic neutron scattering.