ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
Arthur W. Dalton
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 409-415
Technical Paper | Tritium System | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25072
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A cylinder of natural lithium carbonate, supported on a slab of graphite, was irradiated from above by a low-intensity source of 14-MeV neutrons and the tritium produced within it subsequently determined from measurements of beta activity. Results obtained for small lithium carbonate detectors highly enriched in 6Li (96%) or 7Li (99.9%) at six positions along the cylinder axis were compared with predictions based on three-dimensional Monte Carlo calculations and multi-group cross-section data. The experimental accuracy was sufficient to detect deviations from theory > 7% with a 95% level of confidence. On this basis, good agreement with theoretical predictions was obtained for the 7Li results. For the 6Li data, however, significant differences were observed in the lower half of the assembly. A detailed analysis indicated that these deviations could not be explained in terms of conceivable environmental perturbations of the neutron flux and may arise as a consequence of inadequate representation of anisotropic neutron scattering.