ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Jean-François Jaeger, Donald J. Dudziak, Giorgio Friedrich, Walter V. Green, Peter Groner, Max Huggenberger, Peter Köhler, P. Marmy, Sandro Pelloni, Jiri Stepanek, Ulrich Stiefel, Peter Stiller, M. Victoria
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 364-379
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25069
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A hybrid blanket for a reversed-field pinch (RFP) reactor is presented for breeding 233U from thorium. This study focuses on the shell/blanket design and assumes a plasma like that used by Culham Laboratory (CL) in its designs. The 233U bred helps the important neutron economy and allows the tritium breeding ratio to be 0.96 at beginning of life for a mean of 1.06 for a 9 MW·yr/m2 burnup. A thick conducting shell is assumed for discharge stability and field reversal. This need for a good conductor requires that only pure copper or aluminum or alloys thereof be used. Two designs were investigated, one with a pure copper first wall/shell, the other with an aluminum alloy. In these designs 3.4% of the thorium is converted to 233U. This corresponds to 18.3 tonnes U in both cases for average thermal powers of 4590 and 4450 MW, respectively, at a wall loading of 2.2 MW/m2 during the burn phase. The breeding rates of 233U are, respectively, 0.66 and 0.69 kg/MW·yr, representing ratios of fission events per bred atom of 0.26 and 0.22, which is naturally better than in the fast breeder. In both designs the low metallurgie temperature limit means the large amount of power deposited on and in the shell is not attractive thermodynamically. The resulting large temperature differences in the shell cause high mechanical stresses. The design as it stands is not feasible from the point of view of radiation damage to materials. The pure metal copper shell swells too much (life limit 1.3 to 2 MW·yr/m2), the transmutations limit the electrical life to 3 MW·yr/m2, and low alloys of copper have not yet been irradiated tofluences sufficient for consideration. The aluminum alloy becomes brittle. This and low cycle fatigue each limit the life to 4.5 MW·yr/m2. Further thoughts at CL show that the RFP should work with a thinner shell as well; this would considerably reduce the thermal stresses in the shell and increase its lifetime sufficiently.