ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
From Capitol Hill: Nuclear is back, critical for America’s energy future
The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy convened its first hearing of the year, “American Energy Dominance: Dawn of the New Nuclear Era,” on January 7, where lawmakers and industry leaders discussed how nuclear energy can help meet surging electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence, data centers, advanced manufacturing, and national security needs.
K. Oishi, Y. Ikeda, C. Konno, H. Maekawa, T. Nakamura
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 10 | Number 3 | November 1986 | Pages 579-584
Fusion Nucleonics Experiments | Proceedings of the Seveth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Reno, Nevada, June 15–19, 1986) | doi.org/10.13182/FST86-A24806
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Irradiation of concrete aggregates by 14 MeV neutrons was performed to investigate the activation characteristics of concrete, and to verify the calculation code system THIDA using the FNS facility. From the result it was proven that 42K, 24Na, 43K, 48Sc, 47Ca, 46Sc, and 54Mn, in half life order, make an important contribution to the total activity. In addition, a comparison between experiment and calculation was made. For 24Na and 54Mn, whose cross sections were well estimated, good agreement between experiment and calculation was obtained, which proved the validity of the calculational code. For reaction rates caused by calcium and titanium isotopes, however, calculational results that differed from experimental ones between −20 % to +40 % were obtained. This inconsistency was caused by the uncertainty of the cross section around 14 MeV, because the incident neutron energy was almost 14 MeV. Cross section measurements around 14 MeV of these reactions were performed systematically. Since all samples, except 48Ca, were separated isotopes and were irradiated in the same irradiation field, highly precise data with small relative error could be obtained. Consequently, calculations were performed again using measured cross section values, and then agreement between experiment and calculation was improved with ± 10 %.