ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Wayne R. Meier, Edward C. Morse
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 3 | November 1985 | Pages 2665-2680
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A24688
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for optimizing the design of a fusion reactor blanket as a function of several design variables is described. Applications of the method are described elsewhere. The optimization problem consists of four key elements: a figure of merit (FOM) for the reactor, a technique for estimating the neutronic performance of the blanket as a function of the design variables, constraints on the design variables and neutronic performance, and a method for optimizing the FOM subject to the constraints. The FOM and constraints depend on the application and design objectives of the particular reactor concept. In general, they may be functions of the design variables and of the neutronic performance. A direct search, nonlinear simplex method is used to optimize the FOM subject to the constraints. The optimization algorithm requires the evaluation and comparison of the FOM at many different points in the search for the most attractive point. An evaluation of the neutronic performance is required each time a new point (i.e., a new set of design parameters) is chosen for comparison. The neutronic performance is evaluated by successive variational interpolation. With this approach, analytical expressions can be written for the neutronics performance as a function of the design variables based on only a limited number of reference point, neutron transport calculations. Hence, the FOM can be evaluated at any intermediate point without the need for additional transport calculations.