ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Countering the nuclear workforce shortage narrative
James Chamberlain, director of the Nuclear, Utilities, and Energy Sector at Rullion, has declared that the nuclear industry will not have workforce challenges going forward. “It’s time to challenge the scarcity narrative,” he wrote in a recent online article. “Nuclear isn't short of talent; it’s short of imagination in how it attracts, trains, and supports the workforce of the future.”
G. G. Killough, D. C. Kocher
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 2 | September 1985 | Pages 2569-2574
Environmental Study | Proceedings of the Second National Topical Meeting on Tritium Technology in Fission, Fusion and Isotopic Applications (Dayton, Ohio, April 30 to May 2, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A24666
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this paper we discuss some of the obstacles to the construction of credible models of tritium transport for use in dose assessments. We illustrate these difficulties by comparing model predictions of environmental tritium levels with measurements. Environmental monitoring of tritium has shown that specific activities in precipitation over land are typically higher by a factor of three to four than those in precipitation over the oceans. Experience with modeling CO2 turnover in the oceans has led to the conclusion that two-box reservoir models of the ocean often give unsatisfactory representations of transient solutions. Failure to consider these factors in global models can lead to distorted estimates of collective dose and create difficulties in validation of the model against real data. We illustrate these problems with a seven-box model recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), in which we forced the atmospheric compartment to reproduce an exogenous function based on historic observations of HTO in precipitation at 50°N. The ocean surface response overestimates tritium data from the surface waters of the Northern Atlantic by a factor of about three, and the fresh water response underestimates data from the Ottawa River by nearly an order of magnitude. Revision of the model to include (1) separate over-land and over-ocean compartments of the atmosphere and (2) a box-diffusion model of the subsurface ocean brings the discrepant responses into good agreement with the environmental data. In a second exercise, we used a latitudinally disaggregated model and replaced a tropospheric compartment in the northern hemisphere by historic precipitation data. The model's response greatly underestimates the tritium specific activity in the southern hemisphere. The large discrepancy probably indicates that much of the release from weapons testing occurred in the stratosphere and that a significant fraction of the release occurred as HT rather than HTO. These exercises lead us to doubt that a proper global transport model for tritium is available at present for collective dose assessment.