ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
Thomas J. McCarville, Gregory A. Moses, Gerald L. Kulcinski, Ihor O. Bohachevsky
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1984 | Pages 5-16
Technical Paper | Special Section Contents / ICF Chamber Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST84-A23073
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The frequency dependence of a thermal radiation field complicates the computation of radiative energy transport in optically thin media because the spectrum may be uncoupled from local thermodynamic conditions. A model for combining the effect of the frequency dependence into a radiation temperature chosen to represent the temperature of both local and nonlocal emitting regions is described. The derived equations are much easier to solve than the frequency-dependent equations and can be applied to a broad class of problems. The equations are used to investigate the response of a gas in an inertial confinement fusion (ICF) reaction chamber to target explosions. The response is compared for ambient densities of 1.77 × 1018 and 1.77 × 1017 atom/cm3. The error in using the brightness temperature instead of a color temperature to evaluate the opacities is illustrated. An analytic analysis shows the cooling wave observed from energy releases > 1018 erg will not occur in an ICF cavity. This is confirmed by the numerical calculations.