ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
T. G. Brown, C. A. Flanagan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 4 | Number 2 | September 1983 | Pages 1031-1036
Next-Generation Devices | doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A22994
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Fusion Engineering Design Center/Westinghouse, Electric Corporation, Post Office Box Y, FEDC Building, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, (615)576-5503 The early tokamak reactor configuration was developed as a means to identify engineering and technology problems and, if possible, suggest resolutions. The power reactor was depicted as a large device with many superconducting toroidal field (TF) coils and many distributed internal and external poloidal field (PF) coils. The mechanical configuration dictated a complicated maintenance approach. Access to the plasma chamber was limited. Particular attention has been paid, in recent reactor studies,1-3 to incorporate attractive, cost-effective engineering features to minimize the device complexity and satisfy the assembly and maintenance requirements of the various reactor components. This has been accomplished without degrading the physics operating parameters of the reactor. In the design process, a number of desirable engineering features have been identified that, when incorporated, make the tokamak a much more attractive reactor candidate Recent scoping studies examined a series of superconducting, long-pulse Driven Current Tokamak (DCT) devices. One class of options is an ignited, D-T burning device designated DCT-8. It was concluded that the DCT-8 is a most attractive engineering option to adequately bridge the gap between the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) and the Engineering Test Reactor (ETR).