ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Don Steiner, Charles A. Flanagan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 3 | Number 1 | January 1983 | Pages 6-52
Overview | Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A20816
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
During 1981, the Fusion Engineering Design Center developed a baseline design for the Fusion Engineering Device (FED) called for in the U.S. Magnetic Fusion Energy Engineering Act of 1980. The device has a major radius of 5.0 m with a plasma minor radius of 1.3 m elongated by 1.6. Capability is provided for operating the toroidal field (TF) coils up to 10 T, but the bulk of the operations are designed for 8 T. At 8-T conditions, the fusion power is ∼180 MW (neutron wall loading ∼0.4 MW/m2) and a plasma Q of ∼5 is expected. At 10-T conditions, which are expected to be limited to ∼10% of the total operations, the fusion power is ∼450 MW (∼1.0 MW/m2) and ignition is expected. Maintenance and cost were the key considerations in developing the design. The plasma chamber is assembled by inserting ten shield sectors into a spool support structure. Ten TF coils (7.4- × 10.9-m bore) are employed and produce a 3.6-T field (8 T) or 4.6-T field (10 T) on axis. Options for the TF coils include superfluid-cooled NbTi, subcooled NbTi, and a hybrid coil consisting of both NbTi and Nb3Sn. The poloidal coil system incorporates both normal copper coils (inside the TF coils) and superconducting NbTi coils (outside the TF coils). Plasma bulk heating is accomplished using 50 MW of ion cyclotron resonance heating. Electron cyclotron resonance heating is used for startup assist. A mechanical pumped limiter, located at the bottom of the plasma chamber, establishes the plasma edge and is used to pump hydrogen and helium particles. The first wall consists of water-cooled stainless steel panels complemented with passively cooled graphite armor on the top and inboard walls and on each side of the limiter. The inboard shield is 60 cm thick and the outboard shield is 120 cm thick. Feasible solutions were developed for each of the major systems and subsystems of this FED design. However, key design issues remain, and if resolved could improve the overall design. This design and the supporting basis constitute a departure point for the initiation of a full conceptual design effort.
