ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
J. Giorla, F. Poggi, D. Galmiche, P. Seytor, R. Quach, C. Cherfils, P. Gauthier, S. Laffite, L. Masse
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 51 | Number 4 | May 2007 | Pages 514-518
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST07-A1436
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The first ignition experiments on the Laser Mégajoule facility will use an indirect drive scheme. Our A1040 point design target is a graded doped plastic capsule filled by permeation within a gold cylinder. The deuterium-tritium ice layer may be formed either by classical slow cooling at 1.5 K below triple point, or by rapid cooling at 2.3 K below triple point. To complete the specifications, we first studied the robustness to all technological defects with the current CEA capabilities for these two options of ice formation. The technological imperfections taken into account are regrouped into 1D errors, which keep the implosion spherical, and 3D errors, which induce a deformation of the shell. The 3D robustness is expressed in terms of deformation at peak velocity and compared to the deformation threshold obtained with 2D simulations. The 1D robustness is given by the probability of exceeding 50% of nominal yield. We have taken into account 22 1D parameters and the fusion energy is approximated by a neural network based on 2000 simulations. Although the studies are not finished yet, the first results show that the A1040 design with rapid cooling has sufficient margins with respect to technological defects.