ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Playing the “bad guy” to enhance next-generation safety
Sometimes, cops and robbers is more than just a kid’s game. At the Department of Energy’s national laboratories, researchers are channeling their inner saboteurs to discover vulnerabilities in next-generation nuclear reactors, making sure that they’re as safe as possible before they’re even constructed.
F. Cardoso, C. Pereira, M. A. F. Veloso, C. A. M. Silva, R. Cunha, A. L. Costa
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 61 | Number 1 | January 2012 | Pages 338-342
Modeling and Simulations | Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems | doi.org/10.13182/FST12-A13442
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Among the projects of IV generation reactors available nowadays, the (High Temperature Reactors) HTR, are highlighted due to their desirable characteristics and they have been studied by the Instituto Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologia de Reatores Inovadores/CNPq(Brazil). For this work, it evaluated the neutronic behavior and fuel composition during the burnup using the codes (Winfrith Improved Multi-Group Scheme) WIMSD5 and the MCNPX2.6, inserting different percentages of reprocessed fuel in the core. The fuel type “C” coming from Angra-I nuclear power plant, in Brazil, enriched with 3.1% was burnt by three typical cycles and then reprocessed. It recovered (Pu) and minor actinides (MA)being neptunium (Np), americium (Am), curium (Cm), and processed six different fuels varying percentage insertion of reprocessed fuel and enrichment uranium. It analyzed the multiplication factor, temperatures reactivity coefficients, and the composition during the burnup. The results showed, in the analyzed conditions, only one of these fuels is possible to be used. To compare, a reference fuel using 15% enrichment (235U) was too evaluated.
