ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Uranium prices steady as EIA releases annual market report
The end-of-July spot price for uranium was $86.36 per pound, as reported by Cameco—roughly the same as it has been since February. Analytics firm Trading Economics reported a uranium futures price of $86.60 per pound, a figure that also has been holding steady since early April.
These updates come as the U.S. Energy Information Administration has released its 2025 Uranium Marketing Annual Report, which examines in detail multiple aspects of the U.S. uranium market. Data are derived from answers given in the Uranium Marketing Annual Survey, which collects information on contracts, deliveries (during the past year and projected for the next 10 years), purchased enrichment services, inventories, fuel assembly usage, and market requirements.
H. Takenaga, H. Kubo, Y. Kamada, Y. Miura, Y. Kishimoto, T. Ozeki
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 50 | Number 4 | November 2006 | Pages 503-507
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST06-A1273
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Accumulation of impurity injected for reduction of heat load to the divertor plates was of great concern with a peaked density profile. Applicability of impurity injection to a burning plasma with a peaked density profile was investigated for various impurity accumulation levels using the A-SSTR2 design parameters. Impurity transport analysis indicated that the argon density profile twice as peaked as the electron density profile can yield acceptable radiation profile even with a peaked density profile. The required confinement improvement factor over the IPB98(y,2) scaling slightly increased from 1.4 with the flat density profile to 1.5 with the peaked electron density profile at ne(r/a = 0)/ne(r/a = 0.7) ~ 3. When the argon density profile was determined by neoclassical transport, the radiation loss in the core plasma intensively increased with the peaked density profile, which requires higher confinement enhancement factor of 1.9 at ne(r/a = 0)/ne(r/a = 0.7) ~ 3.