ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
2021 Student Conference
April 8–10, 2021
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Fusion Science and Technology
Don't forget to vote!
The 2021 ANS Election is open. This is your chance to help shape the future of your Society.
All ANS members were sent an email on February 22 with a unique username and password from Survey & Ballot Systems (SBS). If you did not receive this email or you do not have your election login information, please go to directvote.net/ANS, enter your email address that is on file with ANS, and your election login information will be emailed to you.
M. L. Walker, D. A. Humphreys
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 50 | Number 4 | November 2006 | Pages 473-489
Technical Paper | dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST06-A1271
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We examine the issue of definition of coordinates used for plasma shape control simulations and real-time implementations and their relation to the validity of linearized plasma shape response models. By doing a careful analysis of these simple concepts, some subtle issues are exposed. Some of the implications are not obvious and, at first, counterintuitive.It is shown that the dynamics and output equations for plasma shape and current evolution, derived using a common method for linearizing around a plasma equilibrium, are each valid in different coordinates, and therefore additional work is needed to redefine both in a common coordinate system. In particular, it is demonstrated that the set of poloidal field (PF) coil currents that defines the equilibrium about which a model is linearized often does not define a valid origin for the linearized model equations. Requirements for a valid coordinate system are determined, and procedures for constructing such a system are described. We extend this analysis to also cover both cases where the transformed coordinate system is defined relative to a constant origin and where the coordinate origin is a function of time, i.e., to the definition of time-dependent feed-forward nominal trajectories.We also explore the issue of the small signal requirement for maintaining accuracy of the linearized models. It is shown that this requirement does not apply to either coil currents or voltages, but only to certain characteristics of the plasma. In particular, use of a "perturbed" coordinate system is not actually necessary.The primary motivation for this study is to properly account for relatively large changes in PF coil currents needed to maintain plasma shape and plasma current during long pulse discharges when using "small-signal" linearized plasma models. A related objective is to determine conditions under which plasma shape and current controllers must be updated during the discharge to account for the changing plasma response.