ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
R. Leonard Myatt, Nicolai N. Martovetsky, Charlotte Barbier, Kevin D. Freudenberg
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 64 | Number 2 | August 2013 | Pages 161-167
ITER | Proceedings of the Twentieth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE-2012) (Part 1), Nashville, Tennessee, August 27-31, 2012 | doi.org/10.13182/FST13-A18072
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ITER central solenoid (CS) is wound from cable-in-conduit-conductor (CICC) and cooled by supercritical Helium (He) delivered to ~120 inner diameter (ID) turns through integrally welded "inlets." The flow to each inlet splits and passes through two pancakes, exiting at outlets. While both the He supply and return points (outlets) require penetrating the conduit wall, the inlets reside in the highest stress field, and thus become the more critical structural element.The CS Conceptual Design Review (CRD) reference He inlet design has a long, narrow slot in the inside diameter (ID) turn wall with pencil-tip shaped ends. This shape is optimized in order to minimize the hoop stress concentration. The slot length is chosen to expose each of the six superconducting (SC) sub-cables to the He cooling supply. Implementing this design at 120 inlet sites requires substantial machining and welding operations where even virgin conduit has minimal structural margin.A design space exploration produces numerous inlet options. One configuration emerges as the new reference configuration: the oblong, heavy-wall boss. It addresses all of the critical issues: bi-axial stress field, pressure drop and sub-cable flow uniformity, manufacturing costs (complexities and risks) and in-service robustness (least invasive, greatest margin).Finite element (FE) simulations are presented which highlight the results of the optimization and evaluation process.