ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
Seok-Hee Ryu, Kil-Sup Um, Jae-Il Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 2 | February 2015 | Pages 163-172
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-28
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To evaluate the effect of thermal conductivity degradation for high-burnup fuel, a postulated control element assembly (CEA) ejection accident is assessed with the SPACE (Safety and Performance Analysis CodE) code. The SPACE code, which is currently under development as a safety analysis code for nuclear power plants, can predict thermal-hydraulic responses of the nuclear fuel and nuclear steam supply system during design basis accidents with two-fluid, three-field governing equations. Fuel performance behaviors during the CEA ejection accident using six fuel conductivity models including the burnup-independent reference conductivity model, the Lyons model, are investigated and compared with results of the reference model within the range from 0 to 30 GWd/tonne U. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory model predicts the highest peak fuel centerline temperature of 4531°F at 0 GWd/tonne U, and the modified Nuclear Fuels Institute model shows the uppermost value of 4796°F, which is 364°F higher than the reference model at 30 GWd/tonne U. It is also observed that the peak fuel centerline temperature increases linearly with fuel burnup and that the maximum increase rate of the peak centerline temperature per fuel burnup is ∼11.6°F per GWd/tonne U. For all thermal conductivity models, the maximum radial average fuel enthalpies are <230 cal/g, and the rise in radial average fuel enthalpy during the CEA ejection accident still remains within the pellet-cladding-mechanical-interaction failure criterion.