ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Urenco USA marks enrichment milestones
Urenco USA has highlighted the completion of a successful year of advancing nuclear fuel supply in the U.S. by achieving two new milestones this month: The first production of enriched uranium above 5 percent uranium-235, and the startup of the company’s next cascade of centrifuges as part of its capacity installation program.
Selim Sancaktar, David R. Sharp
Nuclear Technology | Volume 84 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 315-318
Technical Paper | Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34215
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) techniques and the lessons learned from previous PRA studies were used to evaluate the effectiveness of various design alternatives for the Westinghouse advanced pressurized water reactor design. This evaluation was done successfully at the design stage prior to the licensing stage and is probably the first example of such an application for a nuclear power plant design. Three measures of risk were utilized: plant core melt frequency per year, severe fission product release frequency per year, and economic risk to the plant owner in terms of present-day dollars. All plant configurations considered met or exceeded the safety criteria associated with regulatory requirements. The comparison of different alternatives was performed iteratively; after each iteration, the system most effective in reducing the total plant core melt frequency was chosen and added to the base plant configuration. The iterations were terminated when a predetermined cutoff level was reached. Probabilistic risk assessment techniques provide a viable method to create additional decision-making information at the plant design stage.