ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
J. L. Rempe, K. Y. Suh, F. B. Cheung, S. B. Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 3 | March 2008 | Pages 210-267
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3924
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In-vessel retention (IVR) of core melt is a key severe-accident-management strategy adopted by some operating nuclear power plants and proposed for some advanced light water reactors (LWRs). If there were inadequate cooling during a reactor accident, a significant amount of core material could become molten and relocate to the lower head of the reactor vessel, as happened in the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident. If it is possible to ensure that the vessel head remains intact so that relocated core materials are retained within the vessel, the enhanced safety associated with these plants can reduce concerns about containment failure and associated risk. For example, the enhanced safety of the advanced 600 MW(electric) pressurized water reactor (AP600) designed by Westinghouse, which relied upon external reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) for IVR, resulted in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approving the design without requiring that certain features common to existing LWRs, such as containment sprays, be safety related. Clearly, ERVC offers the potential to reduce the AP600's construction and operating costs. However, it is not clear that the ERVC proposed for the AP600 could provide sufficient heat removal for higher-power reactors [up to 1500 MW(electric)] without additional enhancements. This paper reviews efforts made and results reported regarding the enhancement of IVR in LWRs. Where appropriate, the paper identifies what additional data or analyses are needed to demonstrate that there is sufficient margin for successful IVR in high-power thermal reactors.