ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Can hydrogen be the transportation fuel in an otherwise nuclear economy?
Let’s face it: The global economy should be powered primarily by nuclear power. And it probably will by the end of this century, with a still-significant assist from renewables and hydro. Once nuclear systems are dominant, the costs come down to where gas is now; and when carbon emissions are reduced to a small portion of their present state, it will become obvious that most other sources are only good in niche settings. I mean, why use small modular reactors to load-follow when they can just produce that power instead of buffering it?
L. Sepold, G. Schanz, M. Steinbrück, J. Stuckert, A. Miassoedov, A. Palagin, M. Veshchunov
Nuclear Technology | Volume 154 | Number 1 | April 2006 | Pages 107-116
Technical Paper | Materials for Nuclear Systems | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3721
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The purpose of the QUENCH experimental program at the Karlsruhe Research Center is to investigate the hydrogen source term that results from quenching an uncovered core, to examine the physicochemical behavior of overheated fuel elements under different flooding/cooling conditions, and to create a database for model development and code improvement. The QUENCH-07 and -09 test bundles consisted of 21 rods, 20 of which were electrically heated over a length of 1.024 m. The Zircaloy-4 rod cladding and the grid spacers were identical to those used in Western-type light water reactors (LWRs), whereas the fuel was represented by ZrO2 pellets. In both experiments the central rod was made of an absorber rod with B4C pellets and stainless steel cladding and of a Zircaloy-4 guide tube. Failure of the absorber rod cladding was detected at the same temperature in both experiments, i.e., at ~1555 to 1585 K. After a B4C oxidation phase at ~1720 to 1780 K and a subsequent transient test phase to well above 2000 K, cooling of the test bundle was accomplished by injecting saturated steam at the bottom of the test section. The presence of the B4C absorber material in the central rod triggers the formation of eutectic melts, i.e., melts that are formed far below the melting point of metallic Zircaloy (~2030 K), and the oxidation of boron/carbon/zirconium-containing melt can lead to increased amounts of hydrogen and to production of CO, CO2, and CH4 compared to a bundle without a control rod. The total amount of hydrogen released during the flooding, i.e., cooling, phase was, however, significantly larger in QUENCH-09 (~0.400 kg) than in QUENCH-07 (~0.120 kg). It is conjectured that it is mainly the period of steam starvation prior to the cooling phase of QUENCH-09 (steam flow reduction from 3.3 to 0.4 g/s for a duration of ~11 min) that caused the enhanced zirconium oxidation in the cooling phase of QUENCH-09. This is the revised and updated version of the paper that was presented at the 2004 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance in Orlando, Florida, on September 19-22, 2004, under the title "Results of the QUENCH-09 Experiment Compared to QUENCH-07 (LWR-Type Test Bundles with B4C Absorber)."