ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Proposed FY 2027 DOE, NRC budgets ask for less
The White House is requesting $1.5 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy in the fiscal year 2027 budget proposal, about 9 percent less than the previous year.
The request from the Trump administration is one of several associated with nuclear energy in the proposal, which was released Friday. Congress still must review and vote on the budget.
W. L. Whittemore
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 18 | Number 2 | February 1964 | Pages 182-188
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A18317
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Atomic neutron-velocity selector has been used at the electron linear accelerator to study the inelastic scattering by liquid methane and liquid parahydrogen of monoenergetic neutrons with incident energies in the range 0.009 to 0.17 eV. The energy dependence of the total cross sections and the neutron spectra produced by specimens of these materials have also been measured. The inelastic scattering of slow neutrons (< 0.010 eV) at 90° by liquid parahydrogen appears to be smaller than expected on the basis of the measured total cross section and the angular dependence calculated by Sarma. Perhaps this is related to the fact that the total cross section is larger than for freely rotating molecules, indicating the possible existence of some hindrance to molecular motion. The slowing-down power, σnE0/E, a quantitative measure of the neutron-moderating ability, is evaluated from the measured inelastic neutron-scattering data and compared for various neutron energies for the two liquids. A consideration of the various data leads to the conclusion (1) that solid methane is better than liquid parahydrogen for production of very “cold” neutrons (E0 < 0.007 eV), and (2) that parahydrogen is superior to liquid methane for production of cold neutrons with E0 < 0.005 eV.