ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NN Asks: Is the U.S. ready for nuclear construction to accelerate?
Craig Stover
Yes, but . . .
The United States is better positioned today for nuclear construction than it has been in decades. Some of that comes from the experience gained at Vogtle and V.C. Summer. I was part of the team that helped start the V.C. Summer project in 2008, and at that time we were trying to build a nuclear construction workforce from scratch. We learned a lot through that effort, and many of those lessons learned have since been studied, documented, and shared.
The nuclear industry is also benefiting from the wave of investment that started growing around 2020. Over the last five or six years, there has been a serious effort across the country to get ready for new nuclear builds. The U.S. government and the private sector are investing billions of dollars in new nuclear. Much of that work is happening before widespread commercial deployment contracts are signed. This is real, and we need to prepare.
P. Gierszewski1, G. Williams2, J. Blevins1, H. Brunnader1, P. Cumyn3, B. Dean4, J. Galambos5, C. Holloway6, R. Kelly7, A. Natalizio1, S. Smith4
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 26 | Number 3 | November 1994 | Pages 1146-1150
Fusion Power Reactor, Economic, and Alternate Concept | Proceedings of the Eleventh Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy New Orleans, Louisiana June 19-23, 1994 | doi.org/10.13182/FST94-A40308
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The CFFTP Pilot plant concept is a driven, steady-state H-mode tokamak with ion cyclotron current drive. The fuel cycle uses low-tritium-inventory technologies, including compact toroid fuelling. The mechanical design is based on helium cooling, radial blanket maintenance, ceramic pebble breeder blanket, and demountable copper magnets. It is expected to operate for 1 full-power-year with 0.25 MW/m2 average (0.4 MW/m2 peak) neutron wall load. The machine would produce 20 MW of fusion power with 40 MW of auxiliary power. The 2.7 MA plasma current is ramped up inductively, and then sustained by the bootstrap current (32%) and fast wave current drive (68%). The plasma would be roughly the size of the TFTR plasma, but elongated with double-null divertors and an aspect ratio of 5. The total electric power consumption would be around 450 MWe. The tritium supply requirements, given partial breeding, would be only 0.8 kg. The on-site tritium inventory would be about 0.3 kg. The direct construction cost is estimated at 1.1 B$Cdn, with a total project cost of 2.3 B$Cdn (1992). CFFTP Pilot would provide steady-state integrated nuclear testing at a fluence and neutron wall load of about one-quarter ITER CDA, for a cost of about one-third ITER CDA. The blanket test area would be similar to the ITER CDA blanket test port area.
