ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Glass strategy: Hanford’s enhanced waste glass program
The mission of the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection (ORP) is to complete the safe cleanup of waste resulting from decades of nuclear weapons development. One of the most technologically challenging responsibilities is the safe disposition of approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 tanks at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
ORP has a clear incentive to reduce the overall mission duration and cost. One pathway is to develop and deploy innovative technical solutions that can advance baseline flow sheets toward higher efficiency operations while reducing identified risks without compromising safety. Vitrification is the baseline process that will convert both high-level and low-level radioactive waste at Hanford into a stable glass waste form for long-term storage and disposal.
Although vitrification is a mature technology, there are key areas where technology can further reduce operational risks, advance baseline processes to maximize waste throughput, and provide the underpinning to enhance operational flexibility; all steps in reducing mission duration and cost.
Guanyi Wang, Qingzi Zhu, Mamoru Ishii (Purdue Univ)
Proceedings | Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018 | Orlando, FL, November 11-15, 2018 | Pages 77-87
As a critical closure equation to the two-fluid model and an important tool to characterize the two-phase flow interfacial transport, interfacial area transport equation (IATE) was formulated by taking various physical mechanisms causing interface area change into account. To fulfill the dynamic prediction advantage of the IATE and further replace the flow-regime-based constitutive relations, the IATE model should be validated by transition data to ensure the model reliability and robustness. Air-water experiments are performed in bubbly to slug transitions flows in a 200×10 mm narrow rectangular duct. Four-sensor conductivity probes are used to measure the local void fraction, interfacial area concentration, and bubble velocity at three axial locations. The sectional void fraction distribution changes significantly with the flow developing. Flow conditions with similar area-averaged void fraction but different superficial mixture velocities are compared, and it is found that the superficial liquid velocity obviously affect the interfacial area concentration. The measured data with developing spatial distribution would be useful to benchmark and improve the current two-phase flow models used in CFD. Besides, the two-group IATE model for narrow rectangular channel is evaluated using the collected data. The average relative error for the interfacial area concentration prediction is 11.4%, but the group II IAC are overestimated for most flow conditions. To realize better prediction in bubbly to slug transition flows, improvement of the current IATE model is required.