ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Liange Zheng, Jonny Rutqvist, Hao Xu, Jens T. Birkholzer (LBNL)
Proceedings | 16th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference (IHLRWM 2017) | Charlotte, NC, April 9-13, 2017 | Pages 20-29
Subsurface manipulations such as those expected from the disposal of heat-emanating radioactive waste in deep repositories can induce strongly coupled Thermal (T), hydrological (H), mechanical (M) and chemical (C) processes. Adequate coupled THMC models are highly desirable or even indispensable for performance assessment of such repositories, for examples for the analysis of bentonite or clay barriers around surrounding the emplaced waste. In this study, we present coupled THMC model simulations of a generic nuclear waste repository in a clay formation with a bentonite-based buffer. The objective is to evaluate the chemical changes in the EBS bentonite and their effects on mechanical behaviors under high temperature, attempting to shed light on whether EBS bentonite can sustain temperatures higher than 100 °C without significant impact on barrier performance.
Two scenarios were simulated for comparison: a case in which the temperature in the bentonite near the waste canister can reach about 200 °C and a case in which the temperature in the bentonite near the waste canister peaks at about 100 °C. Simulations have been done for two types of bentonite: Kunigel-VI and FEBEX bentonite. This enables us to evaluate how different types of bentonite behave in terms of the illitization and subsequent swelling stress change and whether we can generalize these changes to support decision making. The simulations show the occurrence of illitization in the bentonite buffer and the enhancement of illitization under high temperature; the degree of illitization is affected by many chemical factors and subsequently varies a great deal. Our models show that the dissolution of K-feldspar strongly affects illitization in bentonite and the interaction between EBS bentonite and host rock is particularly important for illitization in the long run. Swelling stress reduction in bentonite due to illitization ranges from ~1.5% to ~18% after 1,000 years depending degree of illitization, initial conditions and type of bentonite. FEBEX bentonite undergoes less illitization mainly due to the higher ion concentration in pore water and the lower content of K-feldspar in the bentonite mineral composition. Moreover, the reduction of swelling stress by chemical changes is more pronounced for Kunigel-VI bentonite than for FEBEX bentonite. Overall, the results of our model simulations suggest that an argillite repository with a bentonite-based EBS that is similar to FEBEX bentonite could sustain temperatures much higher than 100°C as far as illitization concerns.
