ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Marco Cigarini, Mario Dalle Donne
Nuclear Technology | Volume 80 | Number 1 | January 1988 | Pages 107-132
Technical Paper | Advanced Light Water Reactor / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A35553
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A parametric thermohydraulic study for an advanced pressurized water reactor (APWR) with a tight fuel rod lattice has been performed. The APWR improves uranium utilization. It has been assumed that the APWR core should be placed in a modern German pressurized water reactor (PWR) plant. Within this study ∼200 different reactors have been calculated. The tightening of the fuel rod lattice implies a decrease of the net electrical output of the plant. APWR cores mean higher core pressure drops and higher water velocities in the core region. The cores tend to be shorter and the number of fuel rods higher than for the PWR. In the range of interest, homogeneous and heterogeneous reactors are about equivalent (same net electrical output of the plant for the same ratio between water and fuel rod volume). For homogeneous reactors the optimum designs are for H/d = 20 (H= axial pitch of the integral spiral ribs on fuel rod surface, d = diameter of the fuel rod) and for heterogeneous reactors for H/d = 35.