ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Luder Tibkin, Mahmoud El-Beshbeeshy, Riccardo Bonazza, Michael L. Corradini
Nuclear Technology | Volume 111 | Number 1 | July 1995 | Pages 92-104
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35147
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Detonation wave theory was applied to the physical process of a vapor explosion. Initially, our experimental observations using hot water as the fuel and saturated refrigerant liquid as the coolant were analyzed with this technique. These tests are notable since peak explosion pressures were far below the critical pressure of the coolant. From the analysis, the volume fractions of the coolant vapor and the volume ratio of the two liquids prior to the explosion were estimated from the measured peak explosion pressures and associated explosion propagation velocities under the assumption that the process was steady and one-dimensional. Complete Hugoniot curves were constructed, and the detonation condition was initially determined under the assumption that flow velocity behind the shock was equal to the mixture sound speed. This assumption was checked with the tangency condition between the Rayleigh line and Hugoniot curve at the Chapman-Jouguet point, as well as the existence of a minimum in the entropy change across the shock wave. The point of minimum entropy showed good agreement with the graphical tangency point, but was slightly different than the sound speed criteria in pressure (<2%) with a larger difference in propagation speed (50%). This discrepancy between the three criteria becomes insignificant as the explosion pressure rises. This is demonstrated by examining a tin-water explosion experiment. This technique appears to be a useful tool to estimate initial conditions for subcritical vapor explosions.