ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Soon Sam Kim, Jerry L. Judd
Nuclear Technology | Volume 110 | Number 1 | April 1995 | Pages 71-85
Fission Reactor | Burnup Credit | doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35097
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Fission rate monitor measurements and startup testing data recorded during operation of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) have been used to validate a three-dimensional PDQ full-core model developed for the physics analysis to support an updated final safety analysis report. The three-dimensional analysis utilizes the flux synthesis technique as well as the explicit method in solving for the spatial flux distribution in the core. Measured data used for comparison are specific powers from a string offission rate monitors, located in water channels of individual fuel elements, as well as the lobe and fuel element powers. Good agreement was observed in the specific power comparison. For the overall pointwise data, the mean errors were within 1.6% with a standard deviation of ±9%. An excellent agreement was observed for the fuel element power except for a few fuel positions in the corner lobes. Measured ATR startup testing data are also compared with the PDQ calculated values. The PDQ calculated parameters were conservative with respect to measured data. The validation study provided valuable data for assessment of the three-dimensional analytical model and techniques to be employed in the ATR physics analysis. The study also indicated that the PDQ three-dimensional flux synthesis solution technique is an economical and reasonably accurate method for determining global and local three-dimensional power distributions in the core.