ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Tim H. J. J. Van Der Hagen, Imre Pázsit, Ola Thomson, Bengt Melkerson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 107 | Number 2 | August 1994 | Pages 193-214
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A34987
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements, taken in the Ringhals-1 boiling water reactor after revision in 1990, showed that instability occurred at high power and low core flow. Measurements in several points of the power-flow map showed that the decay ratio (DR), obtained by conventional methods, jumps from a moderate value directly to unity. This was valid for DR values calculated from both average power range monitor (APRM) and local power range monitor (LPRM) signals. Thus, the conventional DR cannot be used as a measure of the margin to instability. It was found that both global (in-phase) and regional (out-of-phase) oscillations occur, the global with low DR but large signal amplitude, and the regional with high DR but low signal amplitude. The former dominates the DR calculated from both APRMs and LPRMs, except when the instability is fully developed and impedes detection of the actual margin to instability. Methods for obtaining the stability characteristics of both modes separately from neutron noise signals were developed. The DR of the out-of-phase mode appears to be a good indicator of the margin to instability.