ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Ping-Hue Huang, Jing-Tong Yang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 107 | Number 2 | August 1994 | Pages 138-154
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A34984
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Studsvik Core Management System (CASMO-3/SIMULATE-3) has been validated for application to steady-state reactor physics analyses for pressurized water reactors by demonstrating its ability to obtain accurate and reliable results for various conditions and applications. The analyses validated include global reactivity calculations such as boron letdown, low-powerphysics test predictions, detailed pin by pin power distribution, as well as in-core detector reaction rate calculations. The calculated results have been compared to measured data of 13 cycles for Maanshan Units 1 and 2 as well as measured critical experiments, and the accuracies of the method have been quantified. The validation results indicate that the Taiwan Power Company’s steady-state reactor physics methodology performs to a level of accuracy sufficient for the intended applications, and the accuracies in general are slightly better than the worldwide applications.