ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Willard G. Winn
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 2 | August 1993 | Pages 262-273
Technical Paper | Radiation Application | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34848
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Germanium detector efficiencies for vial geometries are modeled as ε = k[1- exp(-bh)]/bh, where h is the sample fill-level of the vial and k and b are constants relative to h. The model is tested against experimental data generated with 6 germanium detectors (8.8 to 90% standard efficiencies), 3 vials (24- to 64-mm diameters, 4- to 65-mm fill-levels), and 11 gamma energies (88 to 1836 keV). These data represent over 1000 comparisons between the model and experimental measurements. The overall agreement is within a few percent, with average deviations <1.0% and root-mean-square deviations <3%. For typical applications, the model requires only a few (2 to 3) vial calibration measurements, as opposed to the larger number (6 to 8) typically used for empirical data fitting. Methods and examples are discussed for use of the general model. Limits of the gen eral model, attenuation corrections for different sample media, and nondestructive assay calibrations for slab samples are also discussed. Also, possible model extensions are discussed for including gamma-energy dependence and Marinelli counting geometries.