ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Joon Gi Ahn, Nam Zin Cho, Jung Eui Kuh
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 1 | July 1993 | Pages 114-121
Technical Note | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34834
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The response rate of ex-core detectors depends on the power level, power distribution, and reactor configuration. For the analysis of the detector response rate for various core power distributions, it is important to generate spatial weighting functions that are insensitive to small changes in the core power distribution and determined by the reactor configuration. Two-dimensional discrete ordinates adjoint transport calculations are used to calculate the core axial weighting functions. The effects of the reactor operating conditions on the core axial weighting functions are analyzed, and it is found that the soluble boron concentration in the reactor coolant has little effect while the core power level affects the core axial weighting functions significantly. A comparison between the results of the adjoint and forward transport calculations shows an excellent agreement. However, the adjoint transport method provides more detailed data and requires less computing time than the forward transport method.