ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Anna A. Afanasieva, Evgeniy V. Burlakov, Alexander V. Krayushkin, Andre V. Kubarev
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 1 | July 1993 | Pages 1-9
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34825
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
When the causes of the accident at Chernobyl Unit 4 on April 26, 1986, were studied, particular attention was given to the positive void reactivity coefficient and the dynamic characteristics of the shutdown system. The role of these factors in the development of the accident is discussed. The physical nature of the void reactivity coefficient is considered. Safety measures added to the remaining RBMK-type reactors are described. These measures include installation of 80 stationary neutron absorbers in the core to decrease the void reactivity coefficient as well as modification of the absorber rods. The results of reactor parameter measurements after these measures were implemented are presented. The calculation methods are outlined, and the changes in the neutron physics characteristics after the Chernobyl accident are described. The measures taken to improve the safety of RBMK reactors preclude the possibility of another accident of the Chernobyl type. Possible further improvements in the operation of an RBMK reactor are discussed.