ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Min Lee, Jiing-Huae Wu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 98 | Number 3 | June 1992 | Pages 289-306
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Operators need to initiate feed-and-bleed (F&B) cooling to depressurize and cool down the reactor coolant system (RCS) of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the event of a loss of all feedwater. Long-term responses of the RCS and containment of a PWR in the loss-of-all-feedwater event with and without F&B cooling are analyzed with the Modular Accident Analysis Program (MAAP) computer code. Results of the MAAP analyses are compared with those from the RELAP5/MOD2 code. Results of the MAAP analyses show that the execution of F&B cooling at 48 min, as the steam generator secondary-side water level reaches a 6%-wide range, could depressurize the RCS along the coolant saturation curve with an average cooldown rate of 13 K/h. The conditions of the RCS reach the entry point of the residual heat removal system at ∼7 h. The RCS could still be depressurized if the execution of the F&B cooling operation is delayed to 70 and 100 min, i.e., ∼6 min after steam generator secondary-side dryout and 2 min after core uncovery, respectively. The average RCS cooldown rate, however, is above the limit specified in the technical specifications. Delaying execution of F&B cooling to 133 min can still depressurize the RCS. That, however, is too late to prevent the core from melting. Plant characteristics that are important for the responses of the RCS to F&B cooling are the flow capacity and the setpoints of the pressurizer power-operated relief valves, the flow rate, and the shutoff head of the high-head safety injection system. Results of the MAAP calculations need to be interpreted carefully because of the simplified nature of the MAAP code. Benchmark exercises of the MAAP input deck against the sophisticated system analysis code are essential for the validity of the MAAP results.