ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Min Lee, Jiing-Huae Wu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 98 | Number 3 | June 1992 | Pages 289-306
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Operators need to initiate feed-and-bleed (F&B) cooling to depressurize and cool down the reactor coolant system (RCS) of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the event of a loss of all feedwater. Long-term responses of the RCS and containment of a PWR in the loss-of-all-feedwater event with and without F&B cooling are analyzed with the Modular Accident Analysis Program (MAAP) computer code. Results of the MAAP analyses are compared with those from the RELAP5/MOD2 code. Results of the MAAP analyses show that the execution of F&B cooling at 48 min, as the steam generator secondary-side water level reaches a 6%-wide range, could depressurize the RCS along the coolant saturation curve with an average cooldown rate of 13 K/h. The conditions of the RCS reach the entry point of the residual heat removal system at ∼7 h. The RCS could still be depressurized if the execution of the F&B cooling operation is delayed to 70 and 100 min, i.e., ∼6 min after steam generator secondary-side dryout and 2 min after core uncovery, respectively. The average RCS cooldown rate, however, is above the limit specified in the technical specifications. Delaying execution of F&B cooling to 133 min can still depressurize the RCS. That, however, is too late to prevent the core from melting. Plant characteristics that are important for the responses of the RCS to F&B cooling are the flow capacity and the setpoints of the pressurizer power-operated relief valves, the flow rate, and the shutoff head of the high-head safety injection system. Results of the MAAP calculations need to be interpreted carefully because of the simplified nature of the MAAP code. Benchmark exercises of the MAAP input deck against the sophisticated system analysis code are essential for the validity of the MAAP results.