ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Michael D. Allen, Harlan W. Stockman, Kenneth O. Reil, Arthur J. Grimley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 92 | Number 2 | November 1990 | Pages 214-228
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34472
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
High-burnup uranium dioxide reactor fuel was heated in-pile at ∼2490 K in a reducing atmosphere (33% H2 in argon) for 16 min. Fission product aerosols and vapors released from the fuel were collected on a series of sequentially opened filters; the fractions of the original fuel inventory collected on the filters were f Cs = 0.56, f I = 0.38, f Ba = 0.078, f Sr = 0.053, f Eu = 0.064, and f Te < 0.002. The measured release rates for nonvolatile fission products were much higher than predicted by existing release codes, whereas tellurium release was much lower. Posttest examination of the fuel indicates extensive fuel/clad interaction, fuel swelling, and infiltration of the fuel by a zirconium-rich metallic melt; this melt kept oxygen potentials in the fuel very low. The low oxygen potentials and fuel disruption may account for the discrepancy between release codes and the test release results.