ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Michael D. Allen, Harlan W. Stockman, Kenneth O. Reil, Arthur J. Grimley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 92 | Number 2 | November 1990 | Pages 214-228
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34472
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
High-burnup uranium dioxide reactor fuel was heated in-pile at ∼2490 K in a reducing atmosphere (33% H2 in argon) for 16 min. Fission product aerosols and vapors released from the fuel were collected on a series of sequentially opened filters; the fractions of the original fuel inventory collected on the filters were f Cs = 0.56, f I = 0.38, f Ba = 0.078, f Sr = 0.053, f Eu = 0.064, and f Te < 0.002. The measured release rates for nonvolatile fission products were much higher than predicted by existing release codes, whereas tellurium release was much lower. Posttest examination of the fuel indicates extensive fuel/clad interaction, fuel swelling, and infiltration of the fuel by a zirconium-rich metallic melt; this melt kept oxygen potentials in the fuel very low. The low oxygen potentials and fuel disruption may account for the discrepancy between release codes and the test release results.