ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
T. C. Hung, V. K. Dhir
Nuclear Technology | Volume 91 | Number 1 | July 1990 | Pages 51-60
Technical Paper | Safety of Next Generation Power Reactor / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34440
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Modified Dynamic Simulator for Nuclear Power Plants (MDSNP) code is applied to predict the one-dimensional thermal-hydraulic response of the shutdown heat removal system (SHRS) in the Sodium Advanced Fast Reactor and to study the effect of uncertainty and variation in certain design parameters of the SHRS. An example of the use of the code as a design tool to optimize the performance of the SHRS is given. The results show that when neither the direct reactor auxiliary cooling system nor the reactor air cooling system (RACS) is available to remove decay heat, the intrinsic thermal capacity of the pool limits the hot pool to a temperature below the sodium boiling temperature until 30 h after reactor scram. The peak hot pool temperature when only the RACS is available is 710°C, which is ∼22°C below the American Society of Mechanical Engineers service D condition. The changes in emissivity and ambient air temperature slightly affect the time at which an overflow occurs, the temperature histories of the pools, and the temperature difference between the pools. A higher elevation of components such as intermediate heat exchangers and direct reactor heat exchangers is found to increase the available hydrostatic head, which, in turn, reduces the temperature difference between the two pools.