ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Shao-Rong Wu, Klaus Rehme
Nuclear Technology | Volume 89 | Number 1 | January 1990 | Pages 103-115
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34362
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements of the mean velocity, wall shear stresses, and turbulent Reynolds stresses were performed in wall subchannels of two rod bundles. The rod bundle of four parallel rods was arranged symmetrically in a rectangular channel. The pitch-to-diameter ratio was 1.148, and the wall-to-diameter ratios were 1.045 and 1.074, respectively. The Reynolds numbers in these investigations were 6.11 × 104 and 7.07 × 104, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate once more that the structure of turbulence in rod bundles differs greatly from the structure in circular tubes. Especially in the narrow gaps between the rods and channel walls, there are increased levels of turbulence intensities in both the axial and azimuthal directions and, hence, of the kinetic energy of turbulence, caused by a strong turbulent momentum transport through the gaps. In comparison with the previous investigations in these geometries, however, arranged asymmetrically in the rectangular channels, the momentum transport between the subchannels across the gap between the rods is negligible. The comparison between the experimental wall shear stress distributions and those computed by the VELASCO code shows strong deviations, especially in the gap regions between the rods and channel walls. More sophisticated analytical tools than presently available are required to predict turbulent flow through rod bundles with sufficient accuracy.