ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Khalid A. Al-Hussan, Tien-Ko Wang, Mohamed A. Obeid
Nuclear Technology | Volume 85 | Number 2 | May 1989 | Pages 238-244
Technical Paper | Technique | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34244
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray heating rates from 60Co and 137Cs are measured independently in a stainless steel sphere using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) with different sensitivities and atomic numbers, a useful check on dosimetric measurements. Gamma-ray dose-weighting f factors, based on the general cavity ionization theory, are applied to convert the net TLD dose rates into gamma-ray heating rates in stainless steel. Gamma-ray spectra are calculated using the ANISN computer code together with the DLC-41/VITAMINC cross-section library. The experimental and the calculated gamma-ray heating rates are compared. The calculation-to-experiment (C/E) ratios of the heating rates are close to unity at experimental positions near the gamma-ray source and show drop-off at far positions. This C/E discrepancy comes primarily from the calculations; however, there is a minor contribution to the C/E discrepancy from the TLD overresponse at low gamma energies.