ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Selim Sancaktar, David R. Sharp
Nuclear Technology | Volume 84 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 315-318
Technical Paper | Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34215
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) techniques and the lessons learned from previous PRA studies were used to evaluate the effectiveness of various design alternatives for the Westinghouse advanced pressurized water reactor design. This evaluation was done successfully at the design stage prior to the licensing stage and is probably the first example of such an application for a nuclear power plant design. Three measures of risk were utilized: plant core melt frequency per year, severe fission product release frequency per year, and economic risk to the plant owner in terms of present-day dollars. All plant configurations considered met or exceeded the safety criteria associated with regulatory requirements. The comparison of different alternatives was performed iteratively; after each iteration, the system most effective in reducing the total plant core melt frequency was chosen and added to the base plant configuration. The iterations were terminated when a predetermined cutoff level was reached. Probabilistic risk assessment techniques provide a viable method to create additional decision-making information at the plant design stage.