ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Harry A. Morewitz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 83 | Number 2 | November 1988 | Pages 117-133
Technical Paper | Critical Review | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34155
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several very low probability light water reactor (LWR) accidents can potentially generate sufficient pressure to challenge the reactor containment integrity. A properly designed filtered vented containment system (FVCS) will prevent containment failure from overpressure and at the same time release only some low-risk fission product gases, which do not contaminate the ground. The existing and proposed FVCSs and other filter systems that could perform the same function are reviewed. Dry filters (fibrous mats, gravel beds, and sand beds), wet scrubbers (water pools, submerged gravel beds, washed fibrous mats, and submerged venturi), and combinations of different types of these filters have been proposed or used as FVCSs. The combination of two different filter types in series is particularly effective if they have substantially different aerosol penetration versus size characteristics. When cost/benefit analyses are considered, it is unclear in many cases whether FVCSs are cost-effective or actually reduce overall risk. At present, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not require FVCSs on commercial plants that it licenses. However, some U.S. Department of Energy reactor facilities are equipped with FVCSs and several U.S. utilities have proposed the installation of FVCSs at boiling water reactors (BWRs). They have not been required in Japan, Korea, India, Brazil, Taiwan, Argentina, or Switzerland. In contrast, many European countries believe that cost/benefit analyses have large uncertainties and cannot be used with confidence. They have opted for FVCSs to avoid the possibility of land contamination, to reduce the planned evacuation radius, and to provide an additional option for severe accident management. Although the first European FVCS installation was a large, expensive gravel-bed filter shared by two Swedish BWRs, the trend is toward the installation of small, lower cost FVCSs: sand beds or stainless steel fiber filters at French and German pressurized water reactors and multistage filters, consisting of a submerged venturi scrubber followed by a demister/filter, at German BWRs and Swedish LWRs.