ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Joseph O. Erb, James G. Miller
Nuclear Technology | Volume 83 | Number 3 | December 1988 | Pages 367-373
Technical Paper | Fifth International Retran Meeting / Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34149
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The rod ejection transient is a postulated Condition IV event initiated by the mechanical failure of a control rod mechanism pressure housing. Such a failure results in the rapid ejection of a rod cluster control assembly from the core, followed by a fast reactivity insertion. A severe asymmetric core power distribution may result, possibly leading to fuel rod damage. Reactor protection for the transient is provided by negative reactivity feedback effects and by reactor trips on high neutron flux levels. This transient has been modeled for Virginia Electric and Power Company’s Surry and North Anna nuclear power stations using RETRAN-02. The analysis is performed in two parts. First, the core average power history is calculated using a single-loop model with point kinetics and three axially stacked core control volumes. The ejected rod’s reactivity is inserted linearly over 0.1 s. The negative reactivity feedback effects due to Doppler and moderator temperature changes and the reactor trip are also modeled. The effect of the locally peaked core flux shape, omitted by the nominal point kinetics model, is approximated by applying a conservative power weighting factor to the Doppler reactivity feedback. The core average power history is adjusted to represent peak core power conditions and input to the hot spot thermal-hydraulic analysis model. The hot spot model, which represents a single fuel rod at the core’s peak power, predicts maximum fuel enthalpy and temperature transients. This model has two control volumes, one for the hot spot location and the second for a sink for flow from the hot channel. From these results, the amount of fuel damage and the radiological consequences can be assessed.