ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Thomas E. Blue
Nuclear Technology | Volume 82 | Number 3 | September 1988 | Pages 304-310
Technical Paper | Radioisotopes and Isotope Separation | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34131
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An accelerator-based 145Sm production method is described. A target of a natural samarium compound, for example, Sm2O3, is bombarded with protons in the 70-MeV energy range. The resulting nuclear reactions produce 145Eu as well as other europium isotopes that are chemically separated from the samarium target. If this separation is performed more than 15 min following the irradiation, then only 145Eu and europium isotopes with half-lives longer than the halflife of 145Eu remain in the europium fraction. Following the first separation, the separated europium undergoes radioactive decay until most of the 145Eu in the europium fraction has decayed into 145Sm. Then, a second chemical separation is performed in which the 145Sm is removed from the long-lived europium radioactivities that accompanied the 145Eu in the first separation. The result of the two chemical separations is a high-specific-activity 145Sm product with contaminations from europium radioactivities that depend on the efficiencies of the separations and the time of their performance. The 145Sm yield and purity for this production method for a high-current accelerator are compared with the yield and purity of 145Sm from a reactor-based production method for a high-flux reactor. The yield of 145Sm/day for the accelerator-based production method exceeds the yield per day for the reactor-based production method for reactor targets less than ∼1 g. For modest ratios of europium-to-samarium separation efficiencies for the first separation (∼10), the specific activity of the accelerator-produced 145Sm exceeds the specific activity of the reactor-produced 145Sm for reactor irradiation times <2 days. However, the activity of the 145Sm contaminants is larger for the accelerator-produced 145Sm than for the reactor-produced 145Sm, unless the ratio of europiumto-samarium separation efficiencies for the second separation is greater than ∼5000.