ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 82 | Number 1 | July 1988 | Pages 5-17
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34113
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method was developed for the analysis of a once-through steam generator that is based on a multinode movable boundary formulation and an accurate description of the departure from nucleate boiling boundary. In the development of this method, a liquid-metal reactor steam generator was used as a reference design. To evaluate its performance, the Energy Technology Engineering Center steam generator shutdown experiment in the once-through mode was analyzed. Also, the predictions of this method were compared with those of another steam generator code. These analyses showed that the predictions of this methodology agree very well with the experimental measurements and the predictions of the other code. The maximum difference between the temperatures predicted by this model and measurements was ∼5 K.