ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Randy L. Simmons, Niel D. Jones, Frank D. Popa, Donald E. Mueller, James E. Pritchett
Nuclear Technology | Volume 80 | Number 3 | March 1988 | Pages 343-348
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34058
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The design advantages achievable from the use of zirconium diboride (ZrB2) integral fuel burnable absorbers (IFBAs) in two- and three-loop pressurized water reactor (PWR) cores are examined. The ZrB2 IFBAs were designed and have been extensively tested for use in PWRs. Two fuel loading patterns that utilize IFBAs are analyzed: (a) a three-loop core with an 18-month cycle, very low radial leakage loading pattern, and reduced vessel fluence concerns; and (b) a two-loop core with an annual cycle, very low radial leakage loading pattern, and natural uranium axial blankets (low axial leakage). Both designs demonstrate the versatility of IFBAs in difficult fuel loading patterns. Both designs demonstrate well-behaved radial and axial power peaking factors for annual (two-loop core) and 18-month (three-loop core) cycles. The ZrB2 IFBAs also provide added flexibility in the placement of fresh fuel. This flexibility can improve shutdown margin by placing fresh fuel under control rod locations and can improve fuel cycle cost. Neither design would have been possible with discrete burnable absorbers. By analyzing the two very different designs, it can be seen that ZrB2 IFBAs can be used in tightly constrained fuel loading patterns and will provide added flexibility and/or fuel cycle cost savings in future fuel management strategies.