ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Randy L. Simmons, Niel D. Jones, Frank D. Popa, Donald E. Mueller, James E. Pritchett
Nuclear Technology | Volume 80 | Number 3 | March 1988 | Pages 343-348
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34058
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The design advantages achievable from the use of zirconium diboride (ZrB2) integral fuel burnable absorbers (IFBAs) in two- and three-loop pressurized water reactor (PWR) cores are examined. The ZrB2 IFBAs were designed and have been extensively tested for use in PWRs. Two fuel loading patterns that utilize IFBAs are analyzed: (a) a three-loop core with an 18-month cycle, very low radial leakage loading pattern, and reduced vessel fluence concerns; and (b) a two-loop core with an annual cycle, very low radial leakage loading pattern, and natural uranium axial blankets (low axial leakage). Both designs demonstrate the versatility of IFBAs in difficult fuel loading patterns. Both designs demonstrate well-behaved radial and axial power peaking factors for annual (two-loop core) and 18-month (three-loop core) cycles. The ZrB2 IFBAs also provide added flexibility in the placement of fresh fuel. This flexibility can improve shutdown margin by placing fresh fuel under control rod locations and can improve fuel cycle cost. Neither design would have been possible with discrete burnable absorbers. By analyzing the two very different designs, it can be seen that ZrB2 IFBAs can be used in tightly constrained fuel loading patterns and will provide added flexibility and/or fuel cycle cost savings in future fuel management strategies.